Kusajili – Clinical trials directory

Efficacy & Safety of Dronedarone Versus Amiodarone for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of dronedarone to that of amiodarone for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

• Country Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, United States,
• organs None
• Specialty None

Placebo Controlled Double-blind Dose Ranging Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SSR149744C 50, 100, 200 or 300 mg OD With Amiodarone as Calibrator for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Recent Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Double blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of SSR149744C and select a dose to be further investigated in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical, pharmacological or spontaneous conversion of AF/AFL.

• Country Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United States,
• organs None
• Specialty None

Dose Ranging Study of Celivarone With Amiodarone as Calibrator for the Prevention of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Interventions or Death The Primary objective was to assess the efficacy of Celivarone for the prevention of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) interventions or death. Secondary objectives were: - To assess the tolerability and safety of the different dose regimens of Celivarone in the selected population. - To document Celivarone plasma levels during the study.

• Country Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United States,
• organs None
• Specialty None

CP-675,206 Versus Either Dacarbazine Or Temozolomide In Patients Without Prior Therapy This is a Phase 3, multi-national, open-label, 2-arm randomized study in patients with surgically incurable metastatic melanoma who have received no prior chemotherapy, or biochemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma who are randomized to receive CP-675,206 with that of patients who are randomized to receive either dacarbazine or temozolomide (investigator choice)

• Country Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States,
• organs None
• Specialty None