Kusajili – Clinical trials directory

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of BIM 23A760 in Patients With Carcinoid Syndrome The purpose of the protocol is to assess the efficacy and safety of BIM 23A760 on patient's overall satisfaction in terms of symptom relief (diarrhoea and/or flushes) in patients with carcinoid syndrome after 24 weeks of treatment.

• Country Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom,
• organs None
• Specialty None

A Study Looking at Diabetes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Immunosuppressive Regimen With or Without Steroids The purpose of this study is to focus on potential differences in the occurrence of new-onset Diabetes Mellitus (a glucose metabolism disorder) when two different regimens of immunosuppressive treatment are compared.

• Country Australia, Belgium, Colombia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
• organs None
• Specialty None

Dose Ranging Study of Celivarone With Amiodarone as Calibrator for the Prevention of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Interventions or Death The Primary objective was to assess the efficacy of Celivarone for the prevention of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) interventions or death. Secondary objectives were: - To assess the tolerability and safety of the different dose regimens of Celivarone in the selected population. - To document Celivarone plasma levels during the study.

• Country Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United States,
• organs None
• Specialty None

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Azimilide or Sotalol vs Placebo for Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Atrial fibrillation (abnormal rhythm in the upper chamber of the heart) is a common supraventricular arrhythmia (a type of abnormal heart rhythm) for which antiarrhythmic therapy is often prescribed. The primary goals of therapy are to maintain sinus rhythm (normal heart rhythm) and to reduce the occurrence of episodes of atrial fibrillation. The double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of this study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral azimilide compared with placebo and with sotalol, an antiarrhythmic drug, in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients who require cardioversion (electric shock to correct heart rhythm) to correct atrial fibrillation. Once this phase of the study is completed, a second phase with a different study design will be conducted. The second phase is an open-label, follow-up phase to the first study. The follow-up phase will continue to evaluate the long-term safety of a daily oral dose of azimilide in patients who complete the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of this study.

• Country Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain,
• organs None
• Specialty None

Crestor Versus Placebo in Subjects With Heart Failure The purpose of the study is to investigate if rosuvastatin, added on top of all other medicines prescribed to subjects with symptomatic systolic heart failure, reduces the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (time to first event)

• Country Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom,
• organs None
• Specialty None

CP-675,206 Versus Either Dacarbazine Or Temozolomide In Patients Without Prior Therapy This is a Phase 3, multi-national, open-label, 2-arm randomized study in patients with surgically incurable metastatic melanoma who have received no prior chemotherapy, or biochemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma who are randomized to receive CP-675,206 with that of patients who are randomized to receive either dacarbazine or temozolomide (investigator choice)

• Country Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States,
• organs None
• Specialty None